- Home
- >
- Research
- >
- Taleo Blog
10/30/07
Is Your Career Site Winning or Losing?
Preliminary findings are out from Staffing.org’s 2007 Job Seeker’s and Employee’s Report. Among them:
50% of the respondents visit [company job sites] regularly or occasionally to look for opportunities. However, familiarity and experience has also fostered discrimination. 75% of all respondents are now consciously ranking the user experience on these sites and “red carding” sites that don’t measure up. 21% say that a poor website would “definitely” affect their decision to apply for a job.
A legacy career site can not only chase away jobseekers, but also customers. As we found in research published in our paper, Career Site 2.0: Taking the Lead in the War for Talent, the perception of your employment brand works both ways:
Candidates, commonly dissatisfied with their jobseeking experience, are also consumers. They transfer their jobseeking experience to the corporate brand, and they draw on their consumer web experiences to set their expectations for their online jobseeking experience.
Web 2.0 technologies and design principles implemented on the corporate careers website can create needed competitive advantage and differentiation through:
• Advanced usability.
• Streamlined data entry.
• Better candidate control.
Implementing a next generation candidate experience will attract and engage higher quality candidates and ultimately help win the war for talent.
Taleo Blog - Talent Management Solutions
Taleo's Talent Management Solutions Blog is about developments in Talent Management - from its definition and practices - to the latest research in the field.
![]() |
| Alice Snell Vice President, Taleo Research Send a comment to the author at research@taleo.com |
| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| << < | > >> | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||
Search
Archives
- November 2009 (4)
- October 2009 (5)
- September 2009 (5)
- August 2009 (5)
- July 2009 (5)
- June 2009 (6)
- May 2009 (6)
- April 2009 (6)
- March 2009 (7)
- February 2009 (6)
- January 2009 (6)
- December 2008 (5)
- more...
Recent Posts
• Latest Research
- Leadership Void
- Safety First
- Home Grown Leaders Get Respect
- Post-Recession Productivity Perils
- Staying, Going, Returning
- Take Home Pay Take Aways
- Talent Acquisition Increases
- Labor Daze
- Just the Facts, Ma’am
- Definitions of Employee Engagement
- Talent Management Correlations
- Social Networks and Talent Strategies
- Make Your Voice Heard!
- Trust Your Processes
- Engaging Prime Talent
- Global Employment Brands
- The Talent Community: A New Conversation
- Executive Views: Talent in Tough Times
- Cut Costs, Not Capabilities
- Engaging Times
- CEO Talent Perspectives
- Ramping Up and Out
- Learning from the Past
- Onboarding Delivers More Productivity/Lowers Costs
- Hiring Happens
• Talent Management
- Drucker On Engagement
- Got Unified Data? Get a United Company
- From Nice to Have to Need to Have
- New Economy, New Solutions
- Talent Management Is Innovation
- Crowd Wisdom in the Cloud
- Measures and Metrics
- Workplace Before Marketplace
- Talent Retention
- Retention vs. Litigation
- Hire and Retain with Quality in Mind
- Diversity on a Global Scale
- Recruiting: Reduce Costs and Reap Results
- The Talent Decade
- Alignment Drives Engagement and Productivity
- Help Wanted Signs
- Diversity Proof Points
- Talent Alignment Boosts Productivity
- Winning Talent Strategies
- Tweets, Twits, and Twitter
- Talent in Action
- Talent Makes Headlines
- Emotional Employment Connections
- Making Every Head Count
- Repurpose Recruiting



