- Home
- >
- Research
- >
- Taleo Blog
08/01/05
Watson Wyatt’s Latest HCI Study
The upcoming Watson Wyatt Human Capital Index study holds some interesting facts to show your CEO or CFO why you need to invest more on some specific talent initiatives.
WW looked at two key corporate financial impacts: 3 year total return to shareholders - below I will call it return, and market premium or how much the intangible assets are worth - I will call it premium.
A few results:
1. Active velocity of labor movement is a value creator: faster time to fill is correlated with significantly better return – 59% compared to 11%. Higher referrals (38% vs. 9%) bring a 48% vs. 23% return and 40% vs. 13% premium.
2. Internal promotion is only good in a moderate fashion. From the results, having 12% internal hires is too low (return -2%) and having 80% is too high but better (return 32%), a mid point at 50% reaps a reward of 56% return.
3. Similarly, turnover must be measured: 5% or 43% are too low and too high with a return of 31% and 34% while 15% turnover reaps a 43% return. Of course these are only overall data results and should be looked at specifically for your organization and industry.
Unfortunately we will not have data for BPO, to better quantify if it pays off in market value to outsource your Talent Management processes.
The WW results are in line with our review of Taleo customers that focus on Excellence in Human Capital Performance. There we saw a return over 2 years of 48% versus 38%.
Taleo Blog - Talent Management Solutions
Taleo's Talent Management Solutions Blog is about developments in Talent Management - from its definition and practices - to the latest research in the field.
![]() |
| Alice Snell Vice President, Taleo Research Send a comment to the author at research@taleo.com |
| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| << < | > >> | |||||
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | ||||||
Search
Archives
- November 2009 (4)
- October 2009 (5)
- September 2009 (5)
- August 2009 (5)
- July 2009 (5)
- June 2009 (6)
- May 2009 (6)
- April 2009 (6)
- March 2009 (7)
- February 2009 (6)
- January 2009 (6)
- December 2008 (5)
- more...
Recent Posts
• Latest Research
- Leadership Void
- Safety First
- Home Grown Leaders Get Respect
- Post-Recession Productivity Perils
- Staying, Going, Returning
- Take Home Pay Take Aways
- Talent Acquisition Increases
- Labor Daze
- Just the Facts, Ma’am
- Definitions of Employee Engagement
- Talent Management Correlations
- Social Networks and Talent Strategies
- Make Your Voice Heard!
- Trust Your Processes
- Engaging Prime Talent
- Global Employment Brands
- The Talent Community: A New Conversation
- Executive Views: Talent in Tough Times
- Cut Costs, Not Capabilities
- Engaging Times
- CEO Talent Perspectives
- Ramping Up and Out
- Learning from the Past
- Onboarding Delivers More Productivity/Lowers Costs
- Hiring Happens
• Talent Management
- Drucker On Engagement
- Got Unified Data? Get a United Company
- From Nice to Have to Need to Have
- New Economy, New Solutions
- Talent Management Is Innovation
- Crowd Wisdom in the Cloud
- Measures and Metrics
- Workplace Before Marketplace
- Talent Retention
- Retention vs. Litigation
- Hire and Retain with Quality in Mind
- Diversity on a Global Scale
- Recruiting: Reduce Costs and Reap Results
- The Talent Decade
- Alignment Drives Engagement and Productivity
- Help Wanted Signs
- Diversity Proof Points
- Talent Alignment Boosts Productivity
- Winning Talent Strategies
- Tweets, Twits, and Twitter
- Talent in Action
- Talent Makes Headlines
- Emotional Employment Connections
- Making Every Head Count
- Repurpose Recruiting



